WASHINGTON — Longstanding tensions between organized labor groups and Wal-Mart Stores ratcheted up last week at the kickoff to the holiday shopping season.
As SN went to press last week, Wal-Mart was seeking federal intervention to prevent employee groups from disrupting “Black Friday” sales at its stores, as a result of pickets and strikes threatened by union-backed groups of its own workers. The posture represented an abrupt change for Wal-Mart, which earlier this year publicly dismissed similar protests as “publicity stunts.” Moreover, sources said, it provided a peek into the mindset of the retailer and the labor union determined to organize its workers at the dawn of a second term for president Obama.
In an unusual move for the Bentonville, Ark.-based company, Wal-Mart filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board, saying that worker walkouts and demonstrations by the group OURWalmart over recent months amounted to union picketing in excess of the 30-day limit federal law without a petition to join a union. This type of charge requires “priority” handling by the NLRB, which last week was scurrying to come to a ruling before courts closed for the Thanksgiving holiday.
The NLRB complaint by Wal-Mart was its first in a decade, the New York Times reported.
While it was unclear early last week what if anything would come of Wal-Mart’s charge, the filing appeared to be an attempt by Wal-Mart to set the boundaries for a battleground where its opponent is energized by having mobilized a small portion of Wal-Mart’s own forces against it, according to Don Schroeder, a Boston attorney who specializes in specializes in employment policy and collective bargaining for Mintz Levin.
“I think principally, Wal-Mart is driving a stake in the ground in an attempt to get the NLRB thinking about putting some limitations upon the unions that have engaged in this ongoing campaign against Wal-Mart,” Schroeder told SN.
Wal-Mart argues that the United Food and Commercial Workers union is behind efforts from employees groups including OURWalmart and Making Change at Wal-Mart, which have called attention to what they consider to be unjust conditions for Wal-Mart workers by staging walkouts beginning in October. Making Change, a coalition led by the UFCW, said there were plans for action at as many as 1,000 Wal-Mart stores leading up to and on Black Friday.
The UFCW’s staff last week was facilitating press interviews with activist workers and deflecting Wal-Mart’s contention that the UFCW was in control.
“These workers are speaking out for themselves, and we support them,” Julie Anderson, a spokeswoman for the UFCW, told SN last week. “[Wal-Mart] is trying to shift focus to the UFCW. This isn’t about the UFCW, it’s about OURwalmart. The workers are the ones running the show.”
According to Schroeder, labor forces are likely emboldened by the re-election of President Obama, which he said assures a continuation a trend to toward a more worker-friendly NLRB. The agency was able to effect several changes during Obama’s first term that are seen as making organizing easier, he noted.
Read more: Wal-Mart Dowplays Protest Efforts
According to Wal-Mart’s complaint, the UFCW violated federal labor law over the last six months by picketing and other actions, such as in-store “flash mobs.”
Wal-Mart added that the actions were a means of “forcing or requiring Walmart to recognize and/or bargain with the Union as the representative of Walmart employees, or forcing or requiring Walmart employees to accept or select the UFCW as their collective bargaining representative, without being certified as such.”
The NLRB said it was seeking to determine whether there was picketing at Wal-Mart stores and if so, whether it was done with the intent to gain recognition for a union. Part of the investigation will look at the relationship between UFCW and OURWalmart.
Suggested Categories More from Supermarketnews