It's Time For FDA to Define Natural


At the tail end of a year when the genetically modified labeling debate spilled over to GM-containing products that make natural claims, the Food and Drug Administration has again been petitioned to clarify which products can be designated “natural.”

Earlier in 2013, lawyers defending food manufacturers who were sued for using natural claims on foods that contain GMOs and other ingredients considered unnatural by plaintiffs, were hopeful when a California district judge deferred to the FDA to determine the circumstances under which “food products containing ingredients using bio-engineered seed may or may not be labeled ‘natural’ or ‘all natural’ or ‘100% natural.’”

Previous cases resulted in settlements where manufacturers paid fines and removed claims from packages. After being sued, Ben & Jerry’s, which sources 80% of its ingredients non-GMO, removed natural claims and vowed to go GMO-free by mid-2014.

The California judge's decision marked a welcome departure for some. The reason being that although the FDA has yet to define “natural” (it says it’s difficult to define a food product that has likely been processed and is no longer a product of the earth), it has determined that GM foods do not materially differ from other types of food, and even issued a guidance document in 2001 stating: “A label statement that expresses or implies that a food is superior (e.g., safer or of higher quality) because it is not bioengineered would be misleading.”

To add to the confusion, FDA has said that it does not object to use of the term “natural” if the food does not contain added color, artificial flavors or synthetic substances.

Now, the Grocery Manufacturers Association, which staunchly opposes GM labeling, is asking the FDA not only to define “natural” but also allow foods containing genetically modified ingredients to be labeled as such, according to a New York Times report.

A stance on the matter would not just force the FDA off the fence of indecision, but provide much-needed clarity for all parties involved. For an organization tasked with regulating the truthful labeling of all food products, a claim as ubiquitous as "natural" is too influential to avoid.

Suggested Categories More from Supermarket News


Discuss this Blog Entry 1

on Dec 31, 2013

the biggest obstacle is the FDA themselves - they are so incompetent and impotent and inconsistent. they should authorize the certification process (ie SQF etc.) to a 3rd party private organization – it is the only way it will not be insane.

Post new comment
or register to use your Supermarket News ID

Liz Webber

Liz Webber is Engagement Director / Fresh Market Editor at Supermarket News. She covers fresh foods for the magazine and creates multimedia, blog posts and other content for the website. She joined...

Elliot Zwiebach

Elliot Zwiebach has been with Supermarket News for more than 45 years — a span difficult for him to comprehend, having once been the youngest reporter on the staff. During that time he has...
What's Viewpoints?

In their Viewpoints columns, SN editors and guest columnists give their perspectives on current industry issues.

Blog Archive
Penton Media Food Group and Related Sites

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×