Sponsored By

Radio Shack and the painful realities of modern retail

The saga of Radio Shack underscores the need for maintaining relevance. This won’t be the last iconic retailer who shows up on a Chapter 11 list.

Neil Z. Stern, Senior Partner

February 6, 2015

2 Min Read
Supermarket News logo in a gray background | Supermarket News

One of my first retail consulting assignments was also one of the more fascinating ones: Should Radio Shack change its name? This was a long time ago, back in what would now be considered the heyday of the brand, but a compelling question nonetheless. Could there ever be a worse name? Radio, signifying antiquated technology, and a Shack, hardly the most inspirational environment to buy a product.

Our conclusion at the time (right or wrong) was to leave the name but change the meaning. Radio Shack had something like 97% brand awareness and some staggering number (perhaps two-thirds) of U.S. households who had shopped there. We looked hard at what was the essence of the brand, which ultimately became “You’ve Got Questions, We’ve Got Answers.”

So many customers would walk into the store and say, “How do I connect my TV to a VCR?” or, “How can I fix this?” The store sold useful stuff with knowledgeable associates who could answer these questions. We worked on revamping private label (again, the company was a pioneer) and modernizing the stores. It succeeded for a time while we also worked on some amazing (but ultimately unsuccessful) ways to extend the brand like an ambitious concept called Incredible Universe.

Radio Shack had a roller coaster of a ride, many times figuring out ways to extend the relevance of its store as new technologies that needed answers came around. They had the leading market share in mobile phones, as one example.

Ultimately, the question comes down to relevance. As markets change, competition changes, technologies change and the customer evolves, how do you keep your stores relevant to the customer? What are they looking for that you’re not offering? What are they turning to your competitors for? Are there new competitors that didn’t exist five years ago?

Earlier this year, we were asked the question, what should keep retailers up at night? My answer then was relevance. The saga of Radio Shack underscores that. This won’t be the last iconic retailer who shows up on a Chapter 11 list. The painful realities of modern retail make it clear that retailers need to evolve or face a painful end.

What should supermarkets be doing to stay relevant?

About the Author

Neil Z. Stern

Senior Partner, McMillanDoolittle

Neil Z. Stern is a senior partner of McMillanDoolittle specializing in the area of strategic planning and the development of new retail concepts. Neil leads the company’s food practice.

During his 25 year career at McMillanDoolittle, Neil has developed strategies and new concepts for a diverse variety of clients across the retail industry. As a food industry thought leader, Neil has worked across all segments, including supermarkets, convenience stores and foodservice. Key clients have included an impressive mix of large and small food retailers, including Harris Teeter, Price Chopper, Wawa Food Markets, Winn Dixie, McDonald’s Corp., Publix Super Markets, Walmart and Safeway, as well as international companies.

He is editor of McMillanDoolittle’s Retail Watch newsletter and is a frequent speaker on the industry.

Neil has co-authored two books, "Winning At Retail" and "Greentailing and Other Revolutions in Retailing."

Neil is an honors graduate of Columbia University and has attended Northwestern’s Kellogg MBA program.

Stay up-to-date on the latest food retail news and trends
Subscribe to free eNewsletters from Supermarket News

You May Also Like