Sponsored By

Some 70% cast a vote to keep South Dakota’s grocery tax in place

The move differs from other states, like Illinois and Oklahoma, which both eliminated pandemic-era grocery taxes this year

Bill Wilson, Senior editor at Supermarket News

November 8, 2024

1 Min Read
A shopper using a self-checkout kiosk at a grocery store.
If passed, the measure, which the South Dakota Municipal League and several mayors across the state opposed, would have reduced sales tax revenues.Getty Images

A measure on South Dakota’s ballots which would have repealed the state’s grocery tax was rejected on Tuesday by nearly 70% of voters.

State imposed grocery taxes became a country-wide phenomenon during the pandemic, as a way to generate additional revenue. Several states, like Illinois and Oklahoma, have moved to eliminate the taxes this year, and four other states—Kansas, Idaho, Tennessee, and Virginia—reduced the tax.

The measure in South Dakota, IM-28, would have added the following language to current state law: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the state may not tax the sale of anything sold for human consumption, except alcoholic beverages and prepared food. Municipalities may continue to impose such taxes.”

There may have been confusion over the meaning of “human consumption” because South Dakota state law does not define the term.

If passed, the measure, which the South Dakota Municipal League and several mayors across the state opposed, would have reduced sales tax revenues by almost $124 million annually.

“The defeat of IM-28 once again demonstrates support for public education,” said Loren Paul, president of the South Dakota Education Association, in a statement. “IM-28 should have slashed school budgets or made local property taxes skyrocket. We are grateful that voters took time to educate themselves on just how bad IM-28 was for South Dakota.”

Earlier this year, the state of Illinois decided to eliminate its grocery tax, much to the dismay of municipalities. The change will take effect in 2026.

The Illinois Municipal League opposed the plan to cut the 1% tax because it would cost cities millions in revenue. The biggest beneficiaries received as much as $4 million a year.

About the Author

Bill Wilson

Senior editor at Supermarket News

Bill Wilson is the senior editor at Supermarket News, covering all things grocery and retail. He has been a journalist in the B2B industry for 25 years. He has received two Robert F. Boger awards for his work as a journalist in the infrastructure industry and has over 25 editorial awards total in his career. He graduated cum laude from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale with a major in broadcast communications.

Stay up-to-date on the latest food retail news and trends
Subscribe to free eNewsletters from Supermarket News

You May Also Like