Sponsored By

Decision Reversed in Supervalu/C&S Case

ST. PAUL, Minn. — A federal appeals court here this week revived antitrust claims against C&S Wholesale Grocers and Supervalu related to the wholesalers’ 2003 asset swap.

February 14, 2013

1 Min Read
Supermarket News logo in a gray background | Supermarket News

ST. PAUL, Minn. — A federal appeals court here this week revived antitrust claims against C&S Wholesale Grocers and Supervalu related to the wholesalers’ 2003 asset swap.

The decision reversed a lower court’s ruling to dismiss claims brought by five retailers who said the deal allowed the suppliers to overcharge them. The judge in the earlier case ruled that the retailers unfairly got around a requirement that they arbitrate disputes with their wholesalers by bringing claims against the wholesaler with whom they did not have an agreement. The same judge earlier this year dismissed a separate lawsuit brought by D&G Foods and DeLuca’s Market.

In overturning the decision, the three-judge panel ruled 2-1 that there was no evidence that the arbitration contracts could have anticipated the conspiracy claims raised by the retailers.

The retailers filing suit were Supervalu customers Blue Goose Super Market, Millennium Operations and King Cole Foods, and C&S customers JFM Market and MJF Market.

Stay up-to-date on the latest food retail news and trends
Subscribe to free eNewsletters from Supermarket News

You May Also Like